User talk:Mirror Vax

This user may have left Wikipedia. Mirror Vax has not edited Wikipedia since September 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Steve Wozniak

Please, stop reverting. I am correcting the information in the article. Wozniak did not design Breakout, Nolan Bushnell did. Woz programmed it. While Steve Jobs was working at Atari, Bushnell asked if he could do, he said yes, and then asked Woz if he could help him out. Woz ended out coding the original. How can "nobody" not program a game, if it had not been programmed, it would not exist. I do know what programming means, I am a programmer in my spare time. You should also read some books on the subject, such as Infinite Loop by Michael S.Malone which speaks of the topic when Jobs was working at Atari and got Woz to program the original Breakout for Bushnell. Breakout was hardware and software, you know. Maybe it should say 'programmed and designed' for Atari/Bushnell or something similar. — Wackymacs 11:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously never bothered to read the breakout article. It states, correctly, that breakout was not a CPU-based game - it had no software. None. Hence nobody programmed it. Mirror Vax 11:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If there was no software, then what displayed anything on the screen, hmm? You've just said it was not CPU based. So it wasnt hardware or software, ehh? You make no sense. hardware still has to be programmed, by the way. Some of the earliest programming was in hardware. — Wackymacs 11:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK forget all this, I've replaced the word with "developed" instead of programmed or designed, no problem now. — Wackymacs 14:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Print Shop

Are you absolutely sure you know an Amiga release? I only found references to the C64. -- Polluks 15:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See [1]. Or search groups.google.com. [2]. Mirror Vax 18:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are kidding! One reference without price :-7 Did you really read any of the postings? C'mon! -- Polluks 17:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW your first reference says "C-64 only had 48k", do you consider him trustworthy?

You are right. Sorry. I probably confused Print Shop with Deluxe Print. Mirror Vax 18:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, how about an article Deluxe Print? http://amiga.emucamp.com/dprint2.htm -- Polluks 12:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AfdAnons

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Nufy8 18:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try and pass that off as a legimate edit. Deliberate misinformation is vandalism. And please don't remove my warnings on your talk page. Nufy8 18:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --MONGO 18:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Nufy8 18:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I defy you to point to any "misinformation". As it happens, the truth is very nearly the opposite of what the template stated - but that's not my fault, is it? Why don't you block whomever wrote the grossly misleading nonsense about AFD not being a vote? Mirror Vax 19:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anthraxmailbox.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anthraxmailbox.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Turrican.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Turrican.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have PRODed "Loudness War"

Loudness War

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Loudness War, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jrod2 07:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Love and kindness for everyone! Thanks for your efforts for Wikipedia! Loveandkindness 17:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Archonii.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Archonii.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bombuzal.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombuzal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Krakout.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Krakout.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Raid on bungeling bay.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Raid on bungeling bay.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mancopter.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mancopter.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Spelunker(game).gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Spelunker(game).gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Space taxi.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Space taxi.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wizard(game).gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wizard(game).gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About The Loudness war

Mirror Vax, are you the kind of person who goes to a movie theater to watch a show, and once the show is over, sneaks in to another one only to catch few minutes before the end? Why don't you read all the comments before assuming all that? I actually ended up contributing to this article, making it read more comprehensible (So far, no one has reverted anything). Nothing of relevance has been deleted either, and your name was not smeared with false accusations. The Loudness war is doing just fine and several users promised to make sure it remains free of nonsense. So, congratulations on your contribution to WP and come back, don't be a sour-puss :-). Jrod2 06:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Repton1983.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Repton1983.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Castles of Doctor Creep.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:The Castles of Doctor Creep.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beneathappleprodos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Beneathappleprodos.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beneathappledos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beneathappledos.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Spy vs spy.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spy vs spy.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 00:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Wikipedia people

I have nominated Category:Wikipedia people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into another category. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Skomorokh 16:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mirror Vax! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

William C. Patrick III - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:High end audio

Category:High end audio, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:High end audio manufacturers

Category:High end audio manufacturers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Datastormcap.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Datastormcap.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Duct tape alert

I have nominated Duct tape alert, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duct tape alert. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. IvoShandor (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Computing by computer model

Category:Computing by computer model, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Insidecommodoredos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Insidecommodoredos.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spy vs spy.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spy vs spy.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deleteme

The article Deleteme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic. Unreferenced in over a year.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deleteme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deleteme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deleteme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pogo joe.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pogo joe.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nu-Mega Technologies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nu-Mega Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nu-Mega Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 21:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Shamus.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shamus.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians Ottawahitech (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Creative work

The article Creative work has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

just a dictionary definition, no indication the term is notable. Not even the copyright term (which is actually "work of authorship" in the US) -- if it is used in other jurisdictions, you can't tell from this article, which has no sources at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Creative work

The article Creative work has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We should delete this because it could only be a Wictionary item. If dePRODed I will take it to AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Creative work for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creative work is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative work until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-elitism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-elitism. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-elitism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Catrìona (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Castles of Doctor Creep.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Castles of Doctor Creep.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 2 § Category:Atari 8-bit family games

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 2 § Category:Atari 8-bit family games on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk · he/him) 02:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]